Monday, January 2, 2012

on water up the nose and a small matter of an apology

on the occasion of the the third of january, twenty twelve, i do heretofore present unto you a photo essay encompassing a small myriad of subjects.

ahem.

number one.
water up my nose.

number two.
the word hyperbolic.

number three.
a small matter of 100 comments.

the heroine of our photo essay, a lovely woman, name of kate.

today, kate argued with a khmer server over five hundred riel, or 12.5 cents, for which said woman was trying to overcharge kate and her friends for a coca cola.  

kate also purchased a chocolate bar, a fresh appearance at the local i love you mart, ripe for the picking and devouring.  our heroine could just imagine its velvety, smooth milk chocolate ripples cascading over her tastebuds, envisioning the luscious slab to encase the most delicious of smooth milk fillings which was heretofore promised on the external coverings.

to be frank, excitement was all encompassing.

the next moment, the anticipated chocolate was unearthed, quickly snapped into edible portion sizes and nibbled like a small school girl getting her first taste of tater tots with fry sauce in warmth of her elementary's cafeteria.

and so it was, that on this third day of january, twenty twelve, the bar of milky-filled chocolate was perhaps the farthest thing from chocolate, and was in fact nothing to be compared to tater tots with fry sauce, which are a divine deliverance, and from which we can only assume this chocolate was created by none other than clark w. griswold, in his office at the food manufacturing company he works for and produces such things as liquid-less milk and cereal.

to the point, chocolate it was not and excitement was ill-had.

and thusly did our heroine quickly jump to her saving grace of water to erase the taste of the tasteless brown wax, in hopes of quickly extinguishing all remembrances of things for which she was over the moon looking forward to just three minutes prior.

it was, the deep sip of regret.

regret was had not just for the bite of chocolate-imposter, but also for the too-quick-action of water reprieve for kate not only was unable to rid her tongue of wax-like remnants, but also did in fact, for good measure, receive a healthy dose of cold water up the nostrils.

in fact, water proves to be an ally of the brown wax, in torment.

though, we shan't despair, as our heroine was able to quickly capture, with a small amount of re-enactments by a screen-actors-guild-certified actress, the moments we've just discussed and share them with her companions of late, a certain husband and kentuckian friend.

our louisville lover was quite enthralled with the tale and accompanying art, while the hubs-villain did declare his complete lack of enjoyment for the tragedy.

to which kate did exclaim that such a photo essay and tragic tale would certainly claim one million notes, which led us down the dark path of a recurring disagreement:

is it hy-per-BO-lic or hy-PER-bo-lic?

as in, the number one million was simply hyperbolic, but the villain-topher did state that if the heroine could achieve such a rousing audience, he would reverse the chocolate spell by uttering the small words of apology for declaring the woeful tale not worthy of attention.

and so it was agreed that the tale would be spread far and wide and if it could pull the heartstrings of  just one hundred little comments, the husband-villain would be forced to amend and perhaps even atone for his chocolate and photo essay sins!

so i say unto you, dear readers of woe, can you leave a small token or word so that our antagonist shall be vanquished and our heroine shall rise once more?

54 comments:

  1. Honestly, nothing like being let down when you were SO EXCITED. Especially when it comes to the taste buds. Also, this post made my 2am. Thanks...and may the husband-villain atone twofold for his sins!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh man, that's awful! I definitely understand your disappointment! I probably would have been even more upset - I take my chocolate very seriously! :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is why I have things like chocolate sent to me. When I want chocolate, I want chocolate, not some waxy substitute pretending to be chocolate. I am a woman, after all, and chocolate is not to be taken lightly.

    ReplyDelete
  4. you're too funny. what a disappointment!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I tend to go with hy-per-BOL-ic myself. How did I not know you were keeping a blog...added to my list to check out. Good luck getting to 100. If you could emend this to 10, you might make it!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm on your side - and chocolate is a biological necessity.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I can't imagine bad chocolate, especially when you were so excited for it. Send me your address and I'll drop in the mail some quality chocolate because like Chocolate and Corgis said, it is a biological necessity!

    ReplyDelete
  8. If I leave a comment in support of the "villain" and his pronunciation of "hyperbolic" does it still count as one of the 100 comments towards an apology?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I certainly sympathize with your woeful tale. I too was in desperate need (yes, NEED!) of chocolate (in the form of warm gooey brownies) this weekend. My very thoughtful husband made said brownies for me and when the oven timer went off I dashed to the kitchen in excitement. To my horror I realized that my (so wonderful, yet so mistaken) husband had used the directions on the box for "cake like" brownies...NOT the ooey gooey yummy ones I so desperately craved. It.was.tragic!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I worry that said chocolate and perhaps time abroad has harmed the minds of the lead players in this drama. That said, they are beloved by their audience

    ReplyDelete
  11. I worry that said chocolate and perhaps time abroad has harmed the minds of the lead players in this drama. That said, they are beloved by their audience

    ReplyDelete
  12. I usually say hy-per-BOL-ic. But I do say hy-PER-bol-ee when saying "hyperbole." :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Disappointing chocolate could be one of the worst things on the planet.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Super Disappointing experience, made worse by a husband that refuses to properly commiserate.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Boo.. I will now eat some M&Ms in your honor.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I'm all for showing up showy husbands ;)

    ReplyDelete
  17. I second Brooke. I am all for showing up your husband. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  18. MOST INTERESTING AND TRAGIC TALE EVER, WARRANTING CAPITAL LETTERS AND POSSIBLY COUNTING THIS COMMENT AS TWO. Maybe three.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Disappointing chocolate might possibly be the worst thing ever!

    ReplyDelete
  20. I had a similar experience when I finally came across a pack of Red Vines while in school at Michigan (at the time, they were notoriously difficult to come by. Now it's easy. I do not eat Twizzlers. Ever) and I was devastated when they were stale. It hurt my heart. And I shared that hurt with everyone who would listen.

    So I totally understand this chocolate travesty.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I was on a train in Europe for 8 hours with no food (pre-Euros... we thought the train bound for Switzerland would take our German money... but it would not!) and I somehow sorted through all of my luggage for 14 measly francs from France about 5 weeks prior. I traded them in for a candy bar which just needed to be edible... and I figured the chances of that were pretty high in the Swiss mountains and all.

    Yeah. It tasted like cardboard and was probably 5 years expired.

    Your photo essay was epic!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Haha, aww... you are such a stinking cutie. I'm all for photo essays, personally!

    ReplyDelete
  23. I think this is a chocolate story truly worthy of a photo essay... hilarious!! Showy husbands be damned!

    ReplyDelete
  24. I'm team hy-per-BO-lic. Also, water is never powerful enough to bust up bad tastes. It is sad.

    ReplyDelete
  25. A tragic, yet hilarious, tale! And according to the great wide internet (which we know is ALWAYS right) it is hy-per-BOL-ic. And I'd send you real chocolate if I could. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  26. Such a tragedy! I am so sorry your chocolate bar was was a disappointment :(

    ReplyDelete
  27. Tragic that the chocolate was so disappointing!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Ahh, I'm not even a huge fan of chocolate and I'd be soo disappointed!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Ohhhhhhh bad chocolate is the worst :(

    ReplyDelete
  30. Ohhh you poor thing! I did indeed get a good chuckle out of it.. made all the better by the storytelling. ;) You tell husband-villain he better watch out and prepare his apology!! ;) (Also.. sending you mental delicious chocolate.. mmmm)

    ReplyDelete
  31. I'll delurk to support you and also to let you know that your blog is fantastic.

    ReplyDelete
  32. HA! This reminds me of when we were in Lisbon over the summer and we went to a famous patisserie and I selected a beautiful looking tart to eat and had my husband take a picture of me about the bite it...and then I bit into it and it was filled with...

    ...BEEF PATE!!!! Ew. Ew. Ew.!!

    ReplyDelete
  33. Nooo! I think all the water did was swish the wax ('chocolate') around some more... I wonder how well chocolate would hold up in the Cambodian mail system? Topher, apologize this instant!

    ReplyDelete
  34. hubs-villain, bahaha. I will only refer to christopher as hubs-villain from now on. please advise.

    ReplyDelete
  35. water up the nose is always a worthy tale.

    ReplyDelete
  36. How disappointing! You looked so excited about the chocolate, too.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Bad chocolate is horrible and I'm sorry for what happened AND that the water joined in to make it worse :-/

    ReplyDelete
  38. Delurking as well to say - all chocolate is NOT created equal. I am a salty girl, but good chocolate is essential.

    ReplyDelete
  39. So worth attention - what a sad tale of woe! To be disappointed and double-crossed by your water.

    ReplyDelete
  40. It just wouldn't be your blog without these type of posts! Where else could I expect such vital information? :)

    ReplyDelete
  41. Crappy chocolate and water up the nose? What a sad tale indeed! Also - I had a good chuckle over the term 'louisville lover!'

    ReplyDelete
  42. Delurking as well to curse the accursed non-choco choco!

    ReplyDelete
  43. there is NOTHING worse then craving chocolate and getting quite the opposite. :( There were no chocolate bars in the care packages the family sent???

    ReplyDelete
  44. Haha, thanks for the chuckle. I would be dying without chocolate.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Your unfortunate series of events is totally a regular occurrence for me.

    ReplyDelete
  46. totally coming on here to say THANK YOU to the 48 commenters so far and you all rock, even if you polled a vote for the hubs-villain.

    and yes, topher, i know this comment doesn't count in the total 100.

    (he totally checks every few hours!)

    big hearts to ALL Y'ALL!

    ReplyDelete
  47. Let the chocolate spell reversing begin! Or at least come closer to beginning.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Ugh. That stinks! And reminds me of something that happened a few weeks ago to me! I found a lovely, beautifully wrapped dark chocolate bar in the candy drawer at my parents' house. I went to the couch to sit down and enjoy the gloriousness, and when I bit into it, I realized that it had gone bad...as it the chocolate was hard and chalky. NOOOOO! Despair! It was so sad. So, I feel your pain. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  49. Hubs-villian - hilarious! What a crappy day!

    ReplyDelete
  50. How could it not have been chocolate? That's just rude.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Late to the party but doing my commenting part... I imagine the chocolate tasting like those weird liquid candies - they were wax viles filled with sugary fruity syrup. Remember those?

    ReplyDelete